You're right. If you're an Obama supporter, you're either a poor, black criminal, or someone who likes poor black criminals. Or just likes black people.

Either way, worthless scum.

*coughhackCHARLESKEATINGcoughhack*

A wise man. :D I made the mistake, actually, of replying to you before I read your profile.

I'm not an Obama supporter, but I thought your comment was kind of disingenuous, and the sort of thing a McCain supporter (or, heck, the McCain /campaign/) might say, so I responded instantly with snark and the assumption that you were among them. Apologies.

Obama's got his issues, but I've come to realize that they're both socialists. McCain's supporters are just in denial about it.

I just live in a place where it's about 85% diehard GOP folks, 10% Democrats, and everyone else divides up the remaining 5%.

Baldwin, then?

Apparently, some of them... live in Pittsburgh!

I wondered about that "B". Obviously, I wasn't there so I can only speculate, just like the guy who is doubting the "B". My counter-speculation is just as reasonable as his speculation:

1. Turn the picture upside-down and the "B" is no longer backwards. Imagine the victim laying on the ground and the attacker operating from her head -- upside-down.

2. Perhaps the attacker didn't want to really cut the victim, just scare her. Thus, the shallow cut.

3. Perhaps the victim was paralyzed with fear and was not struggling, giving the attacker plenty of time to be precise.

I don't like speculating about things like this. Since there were apparently no witnesses, we'll probably never know what really happened. In the absence of good evidence (more than speculation) to the contrary, I'll err on the side of the victim.